29 May 2010
Jonathan's Cochlear Implant Activation 8 mo
26 May 2010
Apple Is Now Bigger Than Microsoft
A Google-Eye View of the Newspaper Business
Are the Sex Rules That Determine Who Can Donate Blood Outdated?
The victim of a car accident can require as many as 100 pints of blood—that's blood from 100 generous donors across the country, meticulously matched for blood type and screened for diseases. More than 38,000 blood donations are needed daily in the U.S., but only 38 percent of Americans are eligible to donate blood, and of those, only 8 percent actually do.
The list of eligibility criteria that a donor must meet is long, ranging from simple characteristics such as age and weight requirements to more complex ones surrounding medical and travel history. Among them is the risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Certain factors thought to increase this risk, including illicit intravenous drug use and, if you're a man, having had sex with another male even once since 1971, currently prohibit you from ever donating blood. But AIDS research pioneers from the Jewish General Hospital and McGill University in Montreal think the ban is outdated. In their report, published May 25 in the Canadian Medical Association Journal , they call for a change in policy, which was created by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1983—before HIV/AIDS screening tests were available. "Today's technology makes it almost impossible for HIV to slip through, and the total ban puts a huge burden on blood agencies and the blood supply," said lead author Mark Wainberg, in a prepared statement. He helped in the discovery of 3TC, one of the first drugs to control HIV. "We constantly have blood shortages that would not occur, perhaps, if we had a more reasonable policy."(via Scientific American)
-o-o-o-
I've been aconsistent blood donor since I turned 18, and I've often wondered about these questions that seem almost ignorant for our time and current medical technologies. Does it really matter whether a man has come into contact with another man's genitals? We're talking about saving lives, and all blood is run through a series of tests before it's accepted by the blod bank in question. So can we stop judgin whether someone has had sex for payment in the past, and let that person potentially save a life if their blood is accepted?
20 May 2010
Barnes & Noble announces Pubit!, new independent book publishing platform
19 May 2010
*SWOON* Google Introduces Font API and Directory
WebFont Loader
I'm Remembering...
18 May 2010
Remote-controlled robot surrogate could attend your next meeting for you
Need Some Perspective?
MILLENNIALS: Confident. Connected. Open to Change.
GQ’s iPad App Does…OK
Nope. But it might be generating a few extra bucks.
Publishers are being tight-lipped and/or vague about their iPad sales, but here’s some directional news from Conde Nast, which launched one of the first magazine apps for the device. Conde says its iPhone/iPad version of GQ has sold 57,000 copies since its launch in December. (By comparison, Conde moves 900,000 print copies a month to subscribers and newsstand buyers).
Fine. But what about iPad sales, which kicked off in April? Astonishingly, Conde doesn’t actually know, because it doesn’t sell an iPad-specific app. So it can’t tell if any particular sale was bought with the iPhone, iPod touch or iPad in mind.
GQ spokeswoman Peri Dorset allows that the company did see a spike with the April 3 launch of the iPad. And then again with the launch of the 3G model, but that’s about as precise as she’ll get.
We do know, though, that 3 weeks into January, GQ had sold 12,000 copies of that month’s app, and that was just iPhone/iPods. So I’m not convinced the iPad has provided GQ with a huge boost.
Best case scenario, for now, is that the apps provide some ancillary income. How much? GQ sells its app for $2.99, but repeat buyers can get subsequent issues (or back issues) for $1.99. For argument’s sake, let’s guess that two-thirds of GQ’s app buyers are first-time buyers. By my math, that’s about $150,000 in gross sales revenue — $112,400 from $2.99 sales, and $37,400 from $1.99 sales. Knock off 30 percent for Apple’s take and you’re down to $105,000.
Needle-mover? Nope. But Conde also gets the chance to sell some advertisers the right to be a premium app sponsor, so the dollars could pile up, eventually. Enough to cover development costs, at the very least. Call it a decent start.
Talk is Cheap
There's a website working to organize a coordinated dumping of Facebook and there's a search suggestion on Google prompting users to find out how to delete their Facebook account. There are even droves of the technorati leaving the social network. But what does all of this hubbub over Facebook and privacy really add up to?
Computer Algorithm Can Recognize Sarcasm (Which Is Just Soooo Cool)
The pursuit of machine intelligence means we have to come up with ways to communicate with our computers in a way both entities can understand. But while computers process verbal commands in a straightforward fashion, humans tend to use more sophisticated speech forms, employing slang or symbols to convey an idea. So an Israeli research team has developed a machine algorithm that can recognize sarcasm.
SASI, a Semi-supervised Algorithm for Sarcasm Identification, can recognize sarcastic sentences in product reviews online with pretty astounding 77 percent precision. To create such an algorithm, the team scanned 66,000 Amazon.com product reviews, with three different human annotators tagging sentences for sarcasm. The team then identified certain sarcastic patterns that emerged in the reviews and created a classification algorithm that puts each statement into a sarcastic class.
Maniacal Rage
Back in Action
I know. I KNOW! I'm sorry. The past two weeks I have been dealing first with my birthday celebration (I highly recommend the Mexican Party Bus for bar tours if you're in the Bay Area. Mine was 1980s Prom themed and it ROCKED) and then with Bay to Breakers. Both were fantastic, I assure you. But now they are over and I need to get back to aggregating all the fabulous trendy tech news I can. Get excited.